6.10
(1)
Define as:
Then,
So, the interaction Hamiltonian is:
Since:
We have:
By dropping the non-RWA terms such as , we have:
(2) By dropping the third state, we have:
For
Hence, from the Schroedinger equation: , we have:
--- (1)
--- (2)
By combining them, we have:
, where
From the initial condition , , so,
From (2),
The initial condition for is:
So, if , at .
(3) The interaction Hamiltonian is:
In order to diagonalize the qubit space, introduce the states as:
Since ,
where,
We will apply an additional transformation with to a new interaction picture, then, the new interaction Hamiltonian is:
Since ,
For
So, from the Schroedinger equation , we have:
--- (1)
--- (2)
--- (3)
From (3),
By substituting (1), (2), we have:
, where
From the initial condition , , so,
Then
From the initial condition (where we suppose that ) and (3),
Hence, the excitation probability is:
When , to suppress the leakage below 1%,
(4)
Suppose that
The error rate is
To suppress the error rate ,
6.12
6.13
???
6.14
Since the current rotates in the opposite directions in two loops, the external flux in the potential is replaced by .
6.15
is (classically) determined by (6.52):
When
, and
Likewise,
For the inductor ,
Suppose that the wavefunction of and is approximately Gaussian:
Since , the integrand is an odd function.
The diagonal elements are:
Likewise,
Note that
Using the new basis:
we have:
6.16
(1)
where,
Since ,
Hence, the interaction Hamiltonian is:
The first two terms oscillates two times faster than the energy gap , so as an approximation (of a weak interaction), we can drop these terms. Hence, getting back to the original Schroedinger picture, we have:
Using as basis, the matrix representation becomes:
By rearranging the order of basis as , we have:
So in the even space , and are the eigenvectors with eigenvalues and . In the odd space , are the eigenvectors with eigenvalues .
(2)(3) By applying the same matrix representation for the full Hamiltonian, we have:
In the odd space, we have the same eigenvectors (with the same eigenvalues) as (1). In the even space, the eigenvalues are .
The ground state with the eigenvalue is:
Likewise, the eigenstate with the eigenvalue is:
Hence, the probability of finding the exited state in is:
6.17
(1) Using as basis, the matrix representation of non-interactive term is:
The interaction term is the same as in Problem 6.16. So, by rearranging the order of basis as , the full Hamiltonian becomes:
(2) The exact eigenvalues of full Hamiltonian are:
In the even space:
In the odd space:
On the other hand, if we apply the second-order non-degenerate perturbation in the odd space, the eigenvalues without interaction is , and the correction to the eigenvalue is:
Hence the approximate eigenvalues are:
This coincides with the exact result except . This approximation fails when (due to the degeneracy.)
(3) Without interactions, the state stays in the same one:
For ,
Hence, from the Schroedinger equation ,
From the initial conditions , the solution is:
Hence, the fidelity is:
To achieve 99% fidelity, , so .
This is achieved by, for example, .
(5) In the work by Barends et al. (2014), they used the system with coupling 30MHz and interaction time 43nsec to achieve around 99% fidelity.