Basic definitions
Think of a system consisted of:
- A long waveguide with length accommodating a photon field .
- A small resonator at accommodating an electric oscillation .
that has the RWA Hamiltonian (5.60):
--- (5.60)
where we use the unit system with . So, the momentum and the wavenumber are the same . (In general .)
The wavelength of the photon field is numbered as . So, the wavenumber is counted as:
Hence, assuming that , we can replace .
Applying it to the last term of , we have:
So the operator has a scale dependency as . From the second term of , the coupling constant has the same scale dependency
Now we define as a scale independent spectral function. Then, we have the relationship (5.62):
--- (5.62)
Also, in the following discussion, we use the Fourier transformation of the Heaviside step function :
--- (0)
Note that (0) is a relationship as a hyperfunction. So it's valid only when they are combined with the operation .
Formal solution of the photon field
From (5.60), we have the following Heisenberg equations (B.22):
--- (1)
--- (2)
Define as with the initial condition . Then, from (2), we have:
--- (B.23)
A Langevin equation for the resonator
By substituting (B.23) into (1), we have:
--- (5.61)
where .
Markovian approximation
We assume that the resonator resonates with the photon field with some frequency with a slow modulation .
and the contribution to the integration in (5.61) is dominated by the oscillation . So,
In the limit , we have:
( Contribution from around is dominant.)
--- (B.29)
where,
--- (B.30)
By combining these results, we have:
--- (B.26)
And from (5.61), we have:
From this result, you can see that oscillates as . So,
.
This means that is (implicitly) decided from the consistency condition with (B.30):
Solution of the resonator
Now we have the Langevin equation for the resonator:
--- (3)
--- (4)
Define as . Then from (3), we have:
Hence, the solution is:
--- (B.32)
The constant is determined with the initial condition.
From this result, you can see that the contribution from coupling is dominant around the resonant frequency . So changing the coupling strength outside doesn't change the behavior of the system, and we can safely assume that is almost constant. In terms of , this means that
Then, compared to the free plane wave solution , is rescaled with .
So, we define to have a renormalized operator, and (3) becomes:
--- (5.64)
Note that in the discussions above, we used the initial condition at . As a result, corresponds to the input photon generated at . So we named to indicate the input photon.
Input-Output relations
It's also possible to consider the boundary condition at in the Markovian approximation. In this case, the calculation to get (B.29) becomes:
--- (B.29)'
Note that we used the fact that is an even function and is an odd function.
Compared to (B.29), (B.29)' has an opposite sign for , and (5.64) becomes:
--- (5.64)'
where corresponds to the photon field pulling back to the current time from the final status at .
By equating (5.64) and (5.64)', we have:
--- (B.38)